Wednesday, November 23, 2011

A Funny Thing Happened On Michele Bachmann's Way To Late Night With Jimmy Fallon......

When Michele Bachmann walked onto the set of "Late Night with Jimmy Fallon" on Monday, she was accompanied by Fallon's band playing the song "Lyin' A** B****".  .............Really, Jimmy?  Really, NBC???  Really, NO(championforallwomen'scauseseverywhereregardlessofpoliticalpartyaffiliation)W?

After taking some heat for it, Fallon's band leader / drummer Questlove (The Roots) apologized (if that's what you want to call it) for the tragic um..coincidence(?) with this statement:
“The performance was a tongue-in-cheek and spur of the moment decision. The show was not aware of it and I feel bad if her feelings were hurt. That was not my intention.”
Which is funny, because before her appearance, he tweeted: “late night walkon song devotees: you love it when we snark: this next one takes the cake. ask around cause i aint tweeting title.”
Then after the show, he re-tweeted a fan's post: 
“perfect entry song for her.”

Hmm.... Spur of the moment? Looks to me like the only L.A.B. on Late Night Monday night was Questlove.

Now, two days later, NBC has failed to comment or apologize for the incident.  Nor has their been any comment made or action taken by the Nat'l Organization for Women (who, by the way, is STILL surprisingly silent about the multiple sexual assaults that have occurred at occupy camps around the country).  I'm pretty sure (as Bachmann herself pointed out) that had it been Michelle Obama or Hillary Clinton, not only would NOW have rallied behind them with cries of sexism and the insistence that Questlove be fired, but that NBC would have gone out of their way to issue apologies of  the greatest nature, both publicly and privately.  I guess when the target is a strong conservative woman, well.........she deserves it, right?  Maybe Bachmann should hire Gloria Allred to muscle an apology out of NBC...

We (thankfully) live in a country where you are free to dislike Michele Bachmann as a politician or even as a person.  But no matter your politics, there are lines you don't cross.  Turn the tables and I doubt Questlove would be too excited about being welcomed on stage by a derogatory song with the "N" word in the title.  Nor do I think he would appreciate his own mother being mocked by a song with the "B" word in the title.  Michele Bachmann isn't just some woman running for office.  She is a mother.  So, for future reference, Questlove, maybe you can set a rule for yourself that if you wouldn't say it about your own mother, don't say it about any other woman. Period.

Way to have this woman's back, National Organization for WOMEN.  "Actions speak louder than words" comes to mind.......

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Nancy Pelosi: Fair Share?

Nancy Pelosi has said on several occasions that the wealthy should "pay their fair share".... A lot of people are asking what "fair share" is, so I thought I'd weigh in.

I think what Mrs. Pelosi actually means by "fair share" is 28%.  Here's why. That's about how much of her monthly insurance premium she pays. Our tax dollars pay the remaining 72%.

So, in short....
Nancy Pelosi. Net worth $58,000,000. Pays 28% of her own monthly premium. Pays 0% of mine.
Pollytick Chick. Net worth ((laughs)).  Pays 100% of her own monthly premium. Pays 72% of Nancy Pelosi's.

So there you go.  28%.  Fair share.  You might want to go look up the definition of "fair"...

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Dear N.O.W......

According to the "About" section on the website for the National Organization for Women, or NOW (, their mission is as follows:

The National Organization for Women (NOW) is the largest organization of feminist activists in the United States. NOW has 500,000 contributing members and 550 chapters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Since its founding in 1966, NOW's goal has been to take action to bring about equality for all women. NOW works to eliminate discrimination and harassment in the workplace, schools, the justice system, and all other sectors of society; secure abortion, birth control and reproductive rights for all women; end all forms of violence against women; eradicate racism, sexism and homophobia; and promote equality and justice in our society.
Mmmmm k. The highlighted text confuses me. Here's why.... The following "hot topics" can be found on NOW's homepage right now:
  • 850 articles and references to Herman Cain
  • A letter to the Secretary of Health & Human Services pleading for abortion to be covered under Obamacare
  • An article bashing a Dr. Pepper ad for discriminating against women
  • A letter to Penn State's Board of Trustees about recent child sexual assault allegations
  • Numerous articles intended to scare us into believing the Super Committee is going to abolish Social Security and Medicare (it isn't.)
  • A suggestion for legislation to make it illegal for an employer to check an applicant's credit history
  • A plea for women to speak up on "Love Your Body" day
  • An article on how to care for your hair after having extensions-and finally,
  • Why you should love your breasts and wear them proudly.
What you WON'T find anywhere on any of NOW's numerous websites is a single reference to MULTIPLE rapes and sexual assaults at OWS camps across America.
So, to NOW, I pose the following questions:
  • What about the14 year old girl who was SEXUALLY ASSAULTED at Occupy Dallas?
  • What about the 19 year old girl who was RAPED at Occupy Cleveland?
  • What about the man who was arrested for SEXUALLY ASSAULTING 2 different women at Occupy Wall Street?
  • What about the 10 alleged SEXUAL ASSAULTS at Occupy Wall Street that weren't reported to the police?
  • What about the 23 year old woman who was RAPED at Occupy Philadelphia?
  • What about the man arrested at Occupy Seattle for exposing himself to little children?
  • What about the pamphlet drafted and passed around Occupy Baltimore that discouraged protesters from reporting sexual assaults to police?
Shameful.  And dangerous.  But thanks for the tips on taming my frizzy hair!

Monday, November 14, 2011

How To Make $11,000,000 in 20 Years.... Run For Congress!

How would you like to have a job that would allow you to:

  • Start with a minimum salary of $174,000 per year.
  • Retire after working as few as 5 years.
  • Receive guaranteed retirement pay for life as potentially high as $2,000,000.
  • Determine your own salary.
  • Increase your net worth by more than $10,000,000 in just 20 years.
  • Be the beneficiary of a savings account into which your employer pays 1% of your base salary, whether you contribute or not (Similar to a 401k with the exception that you aren't required to deposit even a penny.)
  • Have guaranteed premium health insurance for life and only pay 1/3 of the cost.
Well, you can. All you have to do is be elected to Congress.

With all the talk about the necessity to reduce government spending lately, there's one area I haven't heard any congressmen refer to in their pleas to cut spending on wasteful programs. Congressional pensions and benefit packages.

To start with, Congress is made up of a staggering amount of men and women who individually have a net worth in the millions (in some cases, tens of millions) of dollars. I blogged about the number of millionaires in Congress who enjoy cushy health insurance plans at the cost of the American tax payer; you can read it here:

We know that for the most part, it takes great wealth to run for office on the national level.  I don't begrudge anyone's hard earned wealth. I do, however, have a problem with my tax dollars paying a lifelong pension that greatly exceeds the salary they earned while serving. Keep in mind that a pension is NOT the same as a retirement plan... so while most of Americans' 401k plans have taken painful hits over the past few years as our economy has been in a downward spiral, congressional pension plans haven't wavered.  Like most retirement plans, a congressman's pension increases the longer they serve. No wonder we have so many die-hard career politicians clinging to their seats, no matter the cost. I would, too! Especially given that the benefits that come with these pension plans prove to be double - sometimes triple - those of regular retirement plans.  Naturally, there's a COLA (cost of living adjustment) raise each year..... that just happens to be a larger increase than those offered in private sector. And while most retirement plans are calculated by averaging an employee's 5 largest yearly salaries, then adding 1.5%,  (sit down for this...) Congressional pensions are formulated by averaging the THREE, not five, highest yearly salaries, plus 2.5%.  If you need a reminder of where all this money comes from, it's your pocket.  Private (and most public) sector employees are eligible for retirement at age 65 after working the required number of years. In comparison, one can retire from Congress at the age of 62 after only FIVE years of service...  Seriously?!? Or at the ripe, old age of 50 if they've put in 20 years.... Or at ANY age after they have put in 25 years... And that goes for their staffers, too. Um.....where do I sign up?

And that's not all.  Not only does Congress get to live for the rest of their lives on a grossly inflated (tax-funded) pension, they also enjoy cushy tax-deferred savings plans..... of which, TAX PAYERS match almost dollar for dollar. Or more. As I mentioned earlier, this is similar to a 401k plan. The difference is that employees are required to deposit into their own 401k. Members of Congress aren't required to deposit any amount into their "Thrift Savings Plan". Must be nice to be able to save other people's money for your own retirement <rolls eyes>.

As for health insurance, members of Congress are given a wide variety of providers and plans from which to choose; most of which are far superior to the private plans available to the American public.  There's a widespread myth that members do not pay for these plans, but in fact, they do.  A whopping 1/3.  You and I pay the remaining 2/3 for them.  For life.  Multimillionaires pay 1/3 of their monthly premium....and we pay the rest. Call me crazy, but last time I checked, being a millionaire means you have a lot more money than me. This is in addition to Medicare, by the way...

According to the National Taxpayers Union, a LARGE number of men and women who have retired from Congress will draw $1,000,000 after retirement and some may even draw as much at $2,000,000. WHAT?

Members of Congress also receive Social Security, and like most private sector employees, pay around 6.2% of their salary up to $106,800 into the system.  To be fair, I should point out that they also pay into the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, from which their pensions are paid.  About 1.3% of their salary.  Really...a whopping 1.3%. If you're wondering where the other 98.7% of monies in the fund come from, again... your pocket. Tax dollars.

What's even better is that, as I said earlier, these benefits are guaranteed. And by "guaranteed" I mean not even a crime conviction will strip a congressional retiree of their benefits. The late Dan Rostenkowski (D-Illinois..... surprise) who chaired the House Ways and Means Committee under Reagan was asked to step down after an indictment for several charges including embezzlement. He accepted a plea agreement, plead guilty to the lesser charge of mail fraud, was convicted and sentenced to 17 years in prison (15 of which he served).  All the while, law-abiding American citizens continued to pay Rostenkowski's $96,000+ per year pension. And he isn't alone. According to the National Taxpayers Union, we shell out $800,000 every year in pensions to congressmen CONVICTED OF CRIMES. That includes Illinois crook (I mean governor) Rod Blagojevich's pension of $15,000 per year (plus health insurance, plus savings plan). Thankfully, in June of this year a bill (Congressional Integrity and Pension Forfeiture Act of 2011) was introduced that would prohibit convicted congressmen from receiving pension pay. Whether or not it will pass is the question.

In stark contrast to the guaranteed congressional pensions that average around $60,972 per year, less than four out of ten Americans will receive a pension after retirement. Those that do aren't guaranteed. The lucky ones (less than 15%) will receive an average pension of about $7,500. That's fixed for life, with no yearly COLA increase like those in Congress' pensions.

Add to all of this the privilege of being able to LEGALLY buy or sell stocks and participate in shady land deals based on insider trading information in Congress, and you've got one lucrative job. No wonder none of them ever leave. And when they finally do, wow.... Take former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert. Hastert's net worth when he was elected in 1986 was around $300,000. When he retired in 2007, his net worth was in excess of $11,000,000, thanks to a $207,000,000 earmark he inserted into a federal highway bill for a parkway that just happened to be very close to some land he owned in Illinois (again, Illinois....shocker).

So, to recap....
Most employees with private sector jobs work an average of 43 years and retire at age 67.
Congressmen are eligible for retirement after as few as 5 years at as young as age 50.

Most pensions are calculated by averaging the employee's 5 highest years' pay and adding 1.5%.
Congressional pensions are calculated by averaging the highest THREE years' pay and adding 2.5%.

The average yearly retirement pay for the Americans fortunate enough to have it is $7,500 (does not increase in time; remains $7,500 for life).
The average yearly pension for congressmen is $60,972 (increases yearly based on cost of living).

Americans are eligible for Medicare coverage at the age of 65. Most Americans on Medicare also purchase supplemental plans that they pay for out of their own pockets.
In addition to Congressmen being eligible for Medicare coverage at the age of 65, they also keep their plush health insurance plans, 2/3 of which are paid for by tax payers. Most of whom don't have health insurance themselves.

Most Americans who have 401k plans are required to deposit a minimum amount per year which their employer will match on different scales.
Congressmen are given "Thrift Savings Accounts" into which they may deposit funds that their employer (a.k.a. YOU and I) will match. They are not required to deposit any funds into these accounts, in which case their employer (yeah, us) will still deposit 1% of their base salary.

Soooooo...... about that whole "pay your fair share" thing....

Sources: National Taxpayers Union,,

Wednesday, November 9, 2011


A big, fat shout out to ALL of the men & women who have proudly served in the military of the United States of America!
A big personal THANK YOU! to my daddy, grandfathers, great-grandfathers, and uncles who proudly served and fought for MY freedom, and to a nephew who is currently deployed in Iraq.
Thank you to the wives, husbands, mothers, fathers, children, and families of all of our veterans who sacrificed time - sometimes years - with their loved ones in support of their time served.
God bless America!

Friday, November 4, 2011

Me & Jesse Ventura? Um...

Just a quick update on Jesse Ventura suit against the TSA for unsolicited airport molestations...

It's a sad day when I agree with Jesse Ventura [she says in a low, raspy, screaming-ish whisper].... Save for the fact that I am NOT giving up on my country, I will ALWAYS stand with hand over heart for the National Anthem, and I will NEVER call my country the Fascists States of America. There may be fascists / marxists / communists / socialists living in my country's house at the present time, but I plan on changing that in November 2012.
(And I'm not a crazy conspiracy theorist, either.)
Oh, and I have it on good authority that Ron Paul would NOT consider Ventura as a running mate, so all you Libertarians can sleep well tonight. Whew.
Okay, maybe I don't actually agree with Jesse Ventura on anything at all, except this whole TSA groping / molesting / invasion of privacy thing.
Sidenote: TSA fired an employee this week for a crude note left inside a passenger's suitcase referencing a sex toy found in the suitcase during inspection.  Kudos to TSA for that.

Click here to read Alex Jones's article on the outcome of the case today:
(I also don't align myself in any way, shape, or form with Alex Jones, either. Not even a little.)

And now the TSA is making random highway stops in Tennessee to look for terrorist-ish-y things on vehicles.  Ron Paul and Don't Tread On Me stickers are on the list, by the way.  Here's to hoping this lawsuit attempt is only one of more to come!